More than that doesn't add to connubial bliss, research shows
More frequent sex isn't a buzzkill for a
relationship. It just doesn't pack the same punch, Canadian researchers
report Nov. 18 in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science.
"Our research suggests that couples do not need to
aim to engage in sex as frequently as possible but instead aim to
maintain a connection with their partner," said study lead author Amy
Muise, a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Toronto Mississauga.
The findings are based on three studies involving more than 30,000 people in all.
At issue: How does sexual frequency affect well-being?
Not surprisingly, the research showed that sex is
good, and more sex is better, Muise said. Regularly having sex emerged
as even more important to a happy relationship than money was.
But researchers haven't understood whether there's a point where more sex stops translating to more happiness, she said.
To gain insight, Muise and her colleagues first
looked at results from a survey conducted in the United States every
other year between 1989 and 2012. They focused on responses from more
than 25,000 people, aged 18 to 89.
Among other things, participants answered questions
about sexual frequency (from not at all to four or more times a week)
and their perceptions of their happiness.
In a second study, researchers surveyed 335 people
online, most of whom were heterosexual. Finally, they analyzed findings
from a third study, a 14-year survey of U.S. married heterosexual
couples.
Among couples, those who had more sex were happier
to a point. The boosts in well-being "leveled off once couples reached a
frequency of about once a week," Muise said. "It wasn't bad to engage
in sex more frequently than once a week. It just wasn't associated with
greater well-being on average."
The researchers saw no differences in the findings based on gender, age or length of relationship.
However, the findings didn't prove that frequency of sex
affects happiness, since the research wasn't designed to prove
cause-and-effect.
For single people outside committed relationships,
however, the results were very different. For them, Muise said, more
frequent sex didn't significantly translate to more happiness.
Perhaps any link between sex and happiness for
singles depends on the relationship context or how comfortable people
are with sex outside of a relationship, the researchers said.
The study also found that lovemaking once a week was the average frequency among couples.
"Perhaps this is the average since it seems to
maximize the benefits for well-being," Muise said. "It is likely that
weekly sex is enough for the average couple to maintain their intimate
connection and to feel like they have an active sex life, and this is
why we see this as the leveling-off point."
Russell Smyth, a professor of economics at
Australia's Monash University who studies sexuality, said frequency of
sex isn't the only factor that affects well-being.
His own research has provided evidence to support
assumptions that may seem obvious: Couples are happier when sex is
better, he said, and "men are more likely to get happiness from the more
physical aspects of sex, while women's happiness is more attached to
the emotional aspects."
Even if that's all true, why wouldn't more be better?
"It is like having an ice cream," Smyth said. "You
enjoy your first ice cream. You also enjoy your second ice cream, but
by not as much. You might also get some enjoyment from your third one,
but even less because you are fuller, concerned about calories and so
on."
No comments:
Post a Comment